After the European election Mr.
Hollande and Mr. Cameron called for EU reforms http://www.bbc.com/news/world-europe-27589075 Apparently this has not
let to a strong impetus on the other participants http://www.euronews.com/2014/05/28/eu-leaders-agree-to-review-priorities-to-win-back-public-support/. I see so far no strong initiative for important steps towards a more democratic Europe.
I myself spent the last two years with a working group of the German
Pirate Party without coming to specific structural suggestions. One
thing became cristal clear though: A European democratic „res
publica“ will only work if a
lively European public emerges, ie a public European wide space which is the
main place of discussions for all major political issues which are
important for the citizens of Europe. The current election changed a
little bit here. By appointing top candidates for the European
commission we had for the first time a TV debate which took place on
a European wide scale. The quality of this discourse especially
regarding currency and unemployment was rather disturbing though. Other
debates like the one between Nigel Farage and Nick Clegg took still
place on a national level. As long as the media are organised mainly
nationally there is a strong restriction for a European space for
public dialogue on a wider level. As long as important media are not used transnationally by a major part of the citizens this shows that this European public has yet a far way to go. British media like BBC or the Guardian show that this process is under way since decades and that British media belong to the ones with the most transnational users and future potential to become pan-European mass media.
It's interesting that EU-critical
parties like the AfD (Alternative für Deutschland), UKIP and France
National are better represented in the European Parliament than in
their national assemblies. This leads to the fact that they take part
in this European dialogue. Videos of Nigel Farage speaking in the
European Parliament have been well noticed by German citizens via
youtube. The question whether the AfD succeeds in being accepted by
the UK conservatives in their EP group
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/European_Conservatives_and_Reformists
helps citizens of Germany and Britain to get to know each others
politicals parties better.
Sometimes minor rule changes can have a
major impact on reality and on the thinking and the awareness of the
people just by changing who talks with whom. If parties would start
at some point to work with European wide election lists this could
for instance also lead to a strengthening of the European public. The
same could happen by electing the Europen Commission directly by all
Europeans.
The most important issue before us is
in my opinion the referendum suggested by Mr. Cameron. As far as I
can see Mrs. Merkel and others did not wellcome this initiative. This is a large mistake. The
big danger is that this leads to a debate in Britain only instead of
a truly open European wide debate on possible reforms.
Cameron said:“My strong preference is
to enact these changes for the entire EU, not just for Britain. But
if there is no appetite for a new Treaty for us all then of course
Britain should be ready to address the changes we need in a
negotiation with our European partners. The next Conservative
Manifesto in 2015 will ask for a mandate from the British people for
a Conservative Government to negotiate a new settlement with our
European partners in the next Parliament. It will be a relationship
with the Single Market at its heart. And when we have negotiated that
new settlement, we will give the British people a referendum with a
very simple in or out choice. To stay in the EU on these new terms;
or come out altogether. It will be an in-out referendum. „
Quelle
http://www.faz.net/aktuell/politik/europaeische-union/grundsatzrede-cameron-will-referendum-ueber-verbleib-in-der-eu-12035501.html
I can understand that Mrs Merkel and
others did not wellcome the initiative because Mr, Camerons ideas
resemble more a common market instead of a political integrated
Europe. But within a European debate his voice is a valid and
important part independent of the question whether Britain will stay
in or leave the EU. In so far his initiative is a big chance for
Europe to talk to each other on a broad basis not only on the level of
politicians. And I claim this: Properly done this could lead to a
European public arising which is more valuable for a future European
res publica than all strucural change one could agree upon. Even if
Britain would opt out afterwards, if it played a well accepted role
in the process it might get so fond of it that it joins
sooner or later again. As far as I see it the debate would be taking
place in English by the way, the most hands-on invitation to all Britains to
stay part of the process.
I can only advice Mrs Merkel not to oversee this big chance but to take the opportunity. Besides political leaders the committee of constitutional affairs of the European Parliament http://www.europarl.europa.eu/committees/en/afco/home.html might start such a dialogue on EU reforms as well as NGOs like for instance the European Movement http://www.europeanmovement.eu/.
Keine Kommentare:
Kommentar veröffentlichen